CULTURE MEDIA AND SPORT

Government Olympic Executive

Hugh Robertson: I am publishing today the Government Olympic Executive's quarterly economic report-"London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games Quarterly Economic Report May 2010". This report explains the latest budget position as at 31 March 2010, and outlines some of the many wider economic benefits to the UK.
	The London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games remain on time and within budget. The Olympic Delivery Authority's (ODA) anticipated final cost (AFC) has again not significantly increased which, as of 31 March, was £7.267 billion compared to £7.262 billion at the end of the previous quarter, 31 December 2009. Savings have also been made in the quarter in areas including transport, logistics and landscaping.
	The majority of contingency remains unreleased and the ODA continues to make strong progress in preparing the venues and infrastructure in the Olympic park, with over 65 per cent. of the venues and infrastructure programme to the 2012 games now completed. The main stadium has reached its full height with the recent addition of 14 floodlight gantries. The roof structures of the aquatics centre and velodrome are constructed, as are the pools in the aquatics centre.
	The London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games are continuing to help businesses and people through the recession. More than 1,000 companies have won direct contracts from the ODA worth more than £5 billion and, as of March 2010, a total of almost 10,000 people were working on the Olympic park and village. Twelve per cent. of these workers were previously unemployed before starting work on the Olympic park.
	I would like to commend this report to the Members of both Houses and thank them for their continued interest in and support for the London 2012 games.
	Copies of the "Quarterly Economic Report May 2010" are available at: www.culture.gov.uk and will be deposited in the Libraries of both Houses.

ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Energy Council

Charles Hendry: In advance of the forthcoming Energy Council in Brussels on 31 May, I am writing to hon. Members to outline the agenda items to be discussed. I will represent the UK.
	The first item on the agenda is a progress report from the presidency about negotiations with the European Parliament on the proposal for a regulation on security of gas supply. We understand that the presidency aims to reach a first reading deal with the European Parliament by the end of June. The UK has worked very closely with the presidency, Commission and other like-minded member states and is pleased with the progress made so far.
	There will then be an exchange of views on the energy aspects of the Europe 2020 growth strategy where member states are expected to seek clarity on the process for monitoring performance towards energy efficiency targets, in preparation for a wider discussion of the strategy at the June European Council.
	This will be followed by a debate on the EU's future energy policy as a contribution to the development of the energy strategy for Europe 2011-2020. Discussion will focus on the Commission's "stock-taking" document. Ministers will also be asked to adopt conclusions on the document. The UK is content with the text of the conclusions, which set out high-level principles for the new energy strategy.
	The Commission and presidency will update the Council on a number of international items: the EU-US Energy Council, EU-OPEC, the 12th International Energy Forum, the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, the Energy Community Treaty and Russia/Ukraine. Finally, the Commission will present reports on the implementation of the European energy programme for recovery; the trans-European energy networks in the period 2007-09; and the Baltic energy market interconnection plan.

HEALTH

Review of Prescription Charges

Simon Burns: In 2008 Professor Ian Gilmore, president of the Royal College of Physicians, was asked to lead a review on how a prescription charge exemption for people with long-term conditions should be implemented, including how it would be phased in. He reported in November 2009.
	I wish to thank Professor Ian Gilmore for his work on the report, which we are publishing today. He has undertaken a thorough analysis of the issues and has considered carefully the views of patient representative groups, charities and other interested parties.
	Any decisions on future changes to the system of prescription charges and exemptions would need to be taken in the context of the next spending review, which is due to report in the autumn.
	Professor Gilmore's report has been placed in the Library and copies are available for hon. Members in the Vote Office.

HOME DEPARTMENT

Police Authorities (Funding Allocations)

Nick Herbert: As part of the Government's plan to cut the budget deficit and get the economy moving again, I am today confirming my intention to require the police to make a fair share of the savings needed. I welcome the responsible and constructive way in which policing partners have already responded to the Chancellor's announcement of his plans to reduce the national budget deficit.
	Total Home Office cuts will be £367 million and in order to minimise the impact on the police service the Home Office will cut a greater than proportionate share of its central budget by bearing down on overheads and reducing waste, including significant cuts to consultancy services, marketing costs and travel. However, the police need to contribute towards the overall reduction and I will therefore ask every police authority to make a fair share of savings.
	As a result, I intend to reduce this year's core Government funding to the police by a total of £125 million. I intend to implement this by reducing the Home Office core police settlement and the capital grant. I will, in due course, formally lay before Parliament an amended police grant report for 2010-11 which will be subject to the usual debate and approval process.
	Even after this reduction, Government funding to the police will still increase by £124 million this year to around £9.61 billion. Set out below are updated force allocations for the individual grants which I intend to revise. These have been calculated so that each force will face a cut equivalent to the same percentage of their core Government funding.
	I am confident that savings of less than 1% of expected spending in 2010-11 by Police Authorities can be made while maintaining a frontline policing service. It is for chief constables to use their expertise and decide what makes most sense for their force, but I am quite clear that this saving can be achieved by driving out wasteful spending on support functions, reducing bureaucracy and increasing efficiency in key functions-leaving the frontline of policing strong and secure. I expect forces to be held to this by both police authorities and Her Majesty's inspectorate of constabulary.
	For my part, I am clear that the police should be focused on police work, not paperwork. This is why I am committed to cutting the centrally imposed red tape and bureaucracy that slows police officers down and keeps them off the streets and away from protecting the public.
	The Government have shown their commitment to the police service by undertaking to honour the third year of the current pay settlement for police officers. Our programme for Government has set out measures to ensure a sustainable frontline police service, including a full review of the remuneration and conditions of service for police officers and staff. We also commit in our programme for Government to establishing an independent commission to review the long-term affordability of public sector pensions, while protecting accrued rights. The Government are determined to ensure that we can provide affordable pensions to public servants into the future.
	The spending review reporting in the autumn of this year will set funding levels beyond 2010-11.
	
		
			 Proposed New Allocations of the Home Office Core Police Settlement by Force, Subject to Parliamentary Approval,  and Revised Allocations of Capital Grant. 
			 Police Authority 2010-11 2010-11 2010-11 2010-11 
			  HO Police Grant as Agreed February 2010 Proposed Amended HO Police Grant Capital Grant as Notified January 2010 Amended Capital Grant 
			  £m £m £m £m 
			 English ShireAuthorities 
			 Avon & Somerset 116.1 113.5 3.3 3.0 
			 Bedfordshire 44.6 43.6 1.3 1.2 
			 Cambridgeshire 52.9 51.7 1.6 1.5 
			 Cheshire 69.9 68.2 2.2 2.0 
			 Cleveland 51.6 50.3 1.6 1.5 
			 Cumbria 35.1 34.1 1.1 1.0 
			 Derbyshire 69.6 68.0 2.0 1.9 
			 Devon & Cornwall 117.0 114.4 3.4 3.2 
			 Dorset 43.5 42.6 1.3 1.2 
			 Durham 47.8 46.5 1.6 1.4 
			 Essex 117.5 114.9 3.2 3.0 
			 Gloucestershire 37.8 36.9 1.2 1.1 
			 Hampshire 130.7 127.8 3.9 3.6 
			 Hertfordshire 81.3 79.5 2.3 2.1 
			 Humberside 72.7 70.9 2.2 2.0 
			 Kent 123.4 120.7 3.5 3.3 
			 Lancashire 116.8 113.9 3.5 3.2 
			 Leicestershire 70.5 68.8 2.1 2.0 
			 Lincolnshire 44.0 43.1 1.2 1.1 
			 Norfolk 55.6 54.3 1.7 1.6 
			 North Yorkshire 49.1 48.0 1.5 1.4 
			 Northamptonshire 47.0 45.9 1.4 1.3 
			 Nottinghamshire 82.7 80.7 2.4 2.2 
			 Staffordshire 73.2 71.5 2.1 2.0 
			 Suffolk 45.5 44.5 1.4 1.3 
			 Surrey 71.5 70.1 2.3 2.1 
			 Sussex 107.6 105.2 3.1 2.9 
			 Thames Valley 157.0 153.6 4.6 4.3 
			 Warwickshire 35.1 34.4 1.5 1.5 
			 West Mercia 74.7 73.0 2.3 2.1 
			 Wiltshire 42.1 41.1 1.3 1.2 
			 Shires Total 2,283.8 2,231.7 67.6 63.1 
			 English Metropolitan Authorities 
			 Greater Manchester 253.2 246.8 7.4 6.9 
			 Merseyside 142.2 138.4 4.2 3.9 
			 Northumbria 117.4 113.9 4.1 3.8 
			 South Yorkshire 110.2 107.4 3.3 3.1 
			 West Midlands 277.4 270.5 7.9 7.3 
			 West Yorkshire 194.0 189.2 5.6 5.2 
			 Mets Total 1,094.4 1,066.1 32.6 30.1 
			 London Authorities 
			 GLA - Police 1,169.5 1,141.5 38.4 36.0 
			 City of London 23.3 22.3 1.1 1.0 
			 English Total 4,571.0 4,461.6 139.8 130.3 
			 Welsh Authorities 
			 Dyfed-Powys 35.2 34.4 1.0 0.9 
			 Gwent 48.6 47.5 1.4 1.3 
			 North Wales 48.5 47.4 1.5 1.4 
			 South Wales 105.5 102.9 3.0 2.8 
			 Welsh total 237.8 232.2 6.9 6.4 
			 Total 4,808.8 4,693.8 146.7 136.7 
			 Note: All allocations rounded to the nearest £0.1million. 
		
	
	Counter-terrorism Policing
	In addition to the reduction in core Government funding to the police set out, I intend to reduce resource funding for counter-terrorism policing by £10 million in 2010-11. The Government will nonetheless still be providing £569 million to forces through police counter-terrorism specific grants this year, maintaining 2009-10 funding levels.
	Counter-terrorism policing has benefited from 10 consecutive years of significant growth in funding. I will be taking advice from the police on the most appropriate way to find these savings to ensure that the police service retains the necessary capabilities to counter-terrorist activity and support our national security.

TRANSPORT

High-speed Rail

Philip Hammond: The Government believe that high-speed rail has the potential to bring significant and long-lasting benefits for Britain's economy and society. But we also recognise that there can be unavoidable consequences for those who live closest to any route put forward for such a network, particularly when they urgently need to sell their property. It is for this reason that the Government are of the view that an exceptional hardship scheme is absolutely necessary to help those who are most directly and immediately affected.
	Details of how such an exceptional hardship scheme might operate were published for consultation on 11 March. In order to limit the delay for those in most urgent need of financial assistance, this consultation was due to run for 10 weeks, ending on 20 May. However, having received representations which argued that 10 weeks is not sufficient to allow all those with an interest to have the fullest possible opportunity to comment on these proposals, I announced last week that the deadline for that consultation would be extended by four weeks to 17 June.
	In taking this decision, I have been aware of its implications for those in the most urgent need. Therefore, without prejudice to the outcome of the consultation, I have asked my officials to put shadow arrangements in place so that, should a decision be taken to proceed with the scheme, applications can begin to be considered immediately. By bringing forward the time scale for applications in this way, I hope to minimise uncertainty for those affected and ensure that payments can be made as quickly as possible wherever appropriate.
	Of course, anyone whose application is considered under such shadow arrangements will also have a right of appeal once the formal scheme is up and running.
	Furthermore, once a route is chosen and safeguarded by the Government, eligible property owners will have access to statutory blight compensation.